A brand new wave of transparency is sweeping throughout America’s workplaces–and there’s no trying again. Firstly of the yr, California, Washington, and New York joined Colorado to require pay transparency for many open jobs. A number of different states and localities–together with Illinois and Massachusetts, at the moment are contemplating their very own legal guidelines to require employers to reveal what they’re prepared to pay for open roles.
These legal guidelines have been motivated, partially, by stubbornly persistent gender and racial pay gaps–but additionally by the pragmatic recognition that wages and wage info have been solely accessible to firms through wage benchmarking companies, and to the fortunate people blessed with well-positioned pals.
The hope was that transparency would cut back–or higher but, eradicate–these well-documented market inefficiencies which have penalties for staff’ lifetime earnings.
By most proof, the hope was justified. Early analysis on the results of pay transparency legal guidelines, in addition to analysis on comparable guidelines in different international locations, counsel that they typically result in significant reductions in gender pay gaps and stage the taking part in area for job candidates.
Regardless of the occasional social media screenshot of a comically extensive band or anecdote of an organization deciding to not think about candidates in a state with pay transparency guidelines, these tales entice consideration exactly as a result of they’re the exception. The overwhelming majority of firms posting job listings in pay transparency states are complying with the principles.
Since its founding practically 15 years in the past, Glassdoor has been on the forefront of constructing wage info extra broadly out there to those that don’t have the proper connections. Now we have witnessed firsthand the magic of pay transparency–however we’re additionally conscious that it’s no miracle tablet for all of the ills of the labor market. There are a lot of causes to be hopeful concerning the new wave of pay transparency legal guidelines–and essential causes to be vigilant of their unintended penalties.
To know the brand new dangers and rising challenges, it’s useful to know latest enthusiasm for pay transparency within the context of an extended lineage of open info legal guidelines relationship again practically a century: Public firm financials within the Nineteen Thirties, meals components and vitamin within the Sixties (expanded within the Nineteen Nineties), donations to federal election campaigns and mortgage lending practices within the Nineteen Seventies, and public college efficiency within the 2000s, amongst many others.
Whereas on the onset, many of those new disclosure milestones had their share of critics, as we speak, it’s arduous to think about a functioning inventory market the place buyers couldn’t entry crucial firm info or the place shoppers are pressured to surprise what components (and potential allergens) could also be lurking of their meals.
The professionals who’re answerable for implementing and grappling with new pay transparency legal guidelines on the frontlines appear cautiously hopeful about their potential. Greater than half (55%) of senior individuals leaders employed at a few of Glassdoor’s Greatest Locations to Work 2023 “disagree” or “strongly disagree” with the suggestion that higher pay transparency will make it more durable to retain expertise, and solely a 3rd (34%) “agree” or “strongly agree” that open roles with wage info or pay bands entice a better high quality applicant pool. Usually, they view pay transparency as a finest apply no matter whether or not it’s legally required.
Up to now, pay transparency labored partially as a result of it was a sign for a broader set of investments in worker expertise: Corporations that shared pay ranges have been doubtless signaling to job seekers that they cared extra broadly about equity and transparency with their staff.
That gained’t essentially be the case transferring ahead. Job seekers are going to must search for new alerts that point out an employer is genuinely vested in compensating–and treating–their groups equitably. For employers searching for to tell apart themselves within the ever-competitive marketplace for expertise, they must uncover new methods to speak that advantage.
Whereas daylight could also be the most effective disinfectant, funk inevitably blooms within the shifting shadows. Requiring transparency can shift fairly than eradicate the market dysfunction it goals to repair. Inequities may emerge on extra difficult-to-measure dimensions comparable to advantages use, profession development, and worker expertise. Glassdoor analysis discovered that–past pay–women and men report meaningfully completely different day-to-day experiences at practically a fifth of firms. We additionally recognized significant expertise gaps throughout race/ethnic teams at practically a 3rd of firms. We’re solely starting to discern the contours of the office fairness challenges in these rising areas which have lengthy been within the shadow of pay.
When entry to info is dependent upon community, connections, or the flexibility to pay to play, entry to info disproportionately advantages insiders and perpetuates long-standing inequalities. The brand new wave of pay transparency legal guidelines goals to sort out these age-old issues–and a rising physique of proof suggests they’re doing precisely that. We might be each hopeful and open-eyed about the place it’ll lead us.
Aaron Terrazas is chief economist at Glassdoor.
The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary items are solely the views of their authors and don’t essentially replicate the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.
